Site assessment report

Trần Duy Hưng, Cầu Giấy, Hà Nội

21.013500, 105.799800

Confidential — prepared for the recipient only

01

The score, and what drove it

Each criterion normalised 0–100 against the national scale. The competition criterion subtracts.

Necessary conditions

Chưa đủ điều kiện — điểm vị trí chưa dùng được

The score ranks one site against another — that is the sufficient condition. These are the necessary ones. A blocked condition makes a high score unusable, so it is checked first.

  • UnverifiedQuy hoạch sử dụng đấtKhông kết luận được từ tên loại đất ("Nhóm nhà ở") — cần chuyên viên đọc quyết định quy hoạch.
  • MetNgân sách tối thiểu3,5 tỷ đủ cho 262 kW (6 chỗ sạc, biến áp 630 kVA).
  • Not metKhả thi tài chínhKịch bản cơ sở KHÔNG hoàn vốn trong 15 năm ở mức tiền thuê đang áp dụng — xem ngưỡng giá đất chịu được.

72,4

Site Fit Score / 100

Strong

Chưa đủ điều kiện — điểm vị trí chưa dùng được

Demand → kWh/day/bay (modelled)209.6 kWh
Competitors within 3 km93 stations
Local rank139 / 224
Area typeurban
  • Road access91
  • Demand density80
  • Anchor points78
  • Grid proximity27
  • Existing competitionsubtracts91

Grid proximity

1.59 km

to nearest substation

Existing competition

250 m

to nearest charger

Fuel stations within 3 km

30

Opportunity (demand − competition)

-0.118

CAPEX risk flags

  • High

    Trạm biến áp gần nhất cách 1.59 km — chi phí kéo tuyến trung thế có thể vượt xa dự toán.

  • High

    Có trạm sạc đang vận hành chỉ cách 250 m.

02

Your neighbourhood, ranked

Each square is a scored cell. Shading is the rank within this area, not the national scale — so the best local options stand out.

03

Competitors on the ground

93 operating stations within 3 km

Breakdown by operator type

CategoryStationsAC portsDC portsPeak power
VinFast134496250 kW
Private8811 kW
Other operators48180 kW
Total2552104250 kW

Private = exactly one port and peak power ≤ 11 kW — a home wallbox listed on the network. They inflate the raw count without competing for the same customer, so they are separated out.

Breakdown covers the 25 nearest stations listed here, out of 93 within 3 km.

04

Recommended configuration

The mix your stated budget actually buys, allocated to maximise kW per million invested — with a transformer class that genuinely carries it.

Chargers

  • 120kW× 2
  • 11kW× 2

Total power

262 kW

Charging bays

6

Transformer class

630 kVA

308 kVA load

CAPEX

3.5bn ₫

stated budget: 3.5bn ₫

Unallocated

0m ₫

05

Payback in three scenarios?Same station, same CAPEX. Only the utilisation assumption changes — that single assumption is what most often breaks an EV charging business case.

Land rent — the deciding input

2.2bn ₫/ yrs

from asking prices nearby · 243m ₫/m² × 180 m² × 5%

What land price this station can carry

Payback within 10 yrs
61m ₫/m²
Break even (zero profit)
110m ₫/m²
Asking price here
243m ₫/m²

Land here is above what the station can carry at market rent. It only works if the site is already owned, or leased well below asking price.

Margin per kWh

Average selling price

4,085 đ/kWh

Average cost of energy

882 đ/kWh

=

Gross margin

3,204 đ/kWh

Battery storage and rooftop solar cover 61% of annual throughput, so the average cost of energy sits well below the 2,281 đ/kWh grid tariff.

What operating cost is made of

2.7bn ₫ per year

  • Land rent2.2bn ₫82%
  • Depreciation306m ₫11%
  • Software / CMS108m ₫4%
  • Warranty (2% of CAPEX)70m ₫3%
ScenarioOptimisticScenarioBaseScenarioRisk
Utilisation25%20%15%
Payback3.66 yrsDoes not repayDoes not repay
IRR25.9%
Profit after tax / yr955m ₫-1.2bn ₫-1.4bn ₫

Swipe sideways to see all columns

All financial rows
Throughput573,780 kWh459,024 kWh344,268 kWh
Revenue / yr2.3bn ₫1.9bn ₫1.4bn ₫
ROE25.7%0.0%0.0%

Cumulative cash flow (15 yrs)

The standard scenario never rises above the zero line: at market rent for land at this price, the station does not repay within 15 years. The optimistic bars assume the site is already owned (no rent).

Risk · Year 0: -3.5bnBase · Year 0: -3.5bnOptimistic · Year 0: -3.5bn0Risk · Year 1: -4.9bnBase · Year 1: -4.7bnOptimistic · Year 1: -2.5bn1Risk · Year 2: -6.3bnBase · Year 2: -5.9bnOptimistic · Year 2: -1.6bn2Risk · Year 3: -7.7bnBase · Year 3: -7.1bnOptimistic · Year 3: -635m3Risk · Year 4: -9.1bnBase · Year 4: -8.3bnOptimistic · Year 4: 320m4Risk · Year 5: -11bnBase · Year 5: -9.5bnOptimistic · Year 5: 1.3bn5Risk · Year 6: -12bnBase · Year 6: -11bnOptimistic · Year 6: 2.2bn6Risk · Year 7: -13bnBase · Year 7: -12bnOptimistic · Year 7: 3.2bn7Risk · Year 8: -15bnBase · Year 8: -13bnOptimistic · Year 8: 4.1bn8Risk · Year 9: -16bnBase · Year 9: -14bnOptimistic · Year 9: 5.1bn9Risk · Year 10: -18bnBase · Year 10: -15bnOptimistic · Year 10: 6.1bn10Risk · Year 11: -20bnBase · Year 11: -18bnOptimistic · Year 11: 6.2bn11Risk · Year 12: -21bnBase · Year 12: -19bnOptimistic · Year 12: 7.1bn12Risk · Year 13: -23bnBase · Year 13: -20bnOptimistic · Year 13: 8.1bn13Risk · Year 14: -24bnBase · Year 14: -21bnOptimistic · Year 14: 9.0bn14Risk · Year 15: -26bnBase · Year 15: -23bnOptimistic · Year 15: 10.0bn1510.0bn-26bn
RiskBaseOptimisticYear 11 — thay pin BESS
06

Appendix

Planning & growth

Zoning at this parcel

Nhóm nhà ở

Quy hoạch phân khu

Cannot be determined from the land-use label

Parcel: Thửa 73, tờ 16. Diện tích: 3551.7m²

Asking land prices nearby

243m ₫/m²

202m ₫/m²310m ₫/m²

middle half of listings

133 listings within 5 km

Asking prices set by sellers — not transaction prices, and not the State land price schedule. Reference only.

Notice: This report ranks locations against each other. It is not a permit, a grid connection agreement, or a planning clearance. A final investment decision still needs an on-site survey and written capacity confirmation from the utility.