Volterra – Deep Tech for Eco EV Charging

ROI & site fit

Payback in 3 to 5 years. The site decides where you land.

Three questions and thirty seconds gets you a number for a station your size. Send us the address and we score that exact site, then send you the report.

Step 1 · Estimate in 30 secondsStep 2 · Score your real siteFree · PDF report in 3 days
Step 1: estimate the ROI

Your project

What kind of site is it?

21630

The charger mix, transformer rating, solar and storage are all sized from your answers.

Preliminary estimate

A station this size pays back in 3.5 – 5.1 years

Investment needed

2.6 bn ₫

Payback

3.5 – 5.1 years

IRR over 15 years

16 – 27%

Suggested build

2×60 kW · 7×11 kW

197 kW · 11 bays

Cumulative cash flow, 15 years

The same build under three levels of demand. How busy a station gets is what the site decides.

Quiet site · Yr 0: -2.6bnTypical site · Yr 0: -2.6bnBusy site · Yr 0: -2.6bn0Quiet site · Yr 1: -2.1bnTypical site · Yr 1: -2.0bnBusy site · Yr 1: -1.9bn1Quiet site · Yr 2: -1.6bnTypical site · Yr 2: -1.4bnBusy site · Yr 2: -1.1bn2Quiet site · Yr 3: -1.1bnTypical site · Yr 3: -732mBusy site · Yr 3: -362m3Quiet site · Yr 4: -592mTypical site · Yr 4: -98mBusy site · Yr 4: 396m4Quiet site · Yr 5: -81mTypical site · Yr 5: 536mBusy site · Yr 5: 1.2bn5Quiet site · Yr 6: 429mTypical site · Yr 6: 1.2bnBusy site · Yr 6: 1.9bn6Quiet site · Yr 7: 938mTypical site · Yr 7: 1.8bnBusy site · Yr 7: 2.7bn7Quiet site · Yr 8: 1.4bnTypical site · Yr 8: 2.4bnBusy site · Yr 8: 3.4bn8Quiet site · Yr 9: 2.0bnTypical site · Yr 9: 3.1bnBusy site · Yr 9: 4.2bn9Quiet site · Yr 10: 2.5bnTypical site · Yr 10: 3.7bnBusy site · Yr 10: 4.9bn10Quiet site · Yr 11: 2.1bnTypical site · Yr 11: 3.4bnBusy site · Yr 11: 4.8bn11Quiet site · Yr 12: 2.6bnTypical site · Yr 12: 4.1bnBusy site · Yr 12: 5.6bn12Quiet site · Yr 13: 3.1bnTypical site · Yr 13: 4.7bnBusy site · Yr 13: 6.3bn13Quiet site · Yr 14: 3.6bnTypical site · Yr 14: 5.3bnBusy site · Yr 14: 7.1bn14Quiet site · Yr 15: 4.1bnTypical site · Yr 15: 6.0bnBusy site · Yr 15: 7.8bn157.8bn-2.6bn
Quiet siteTypical siteBusy site

Compared with an ordinary station

Both stations sell the same electricity at the same price, so the revenue line matches. The difference is the power bill. An ordinary station buys everything from the grid; ours produces most of it on site from solar and storage.

Ordinary station★ Volterra
Investment needed1.3 bn ₫2.6 bn ₫
Revenue per year1.4 bn ₫1.4 bn ₫ · identical
Grid electricity per year-1.1 bn ₫-210 m ₫
Profit after tax, year 189 m ₫636 m ₫
Payback14.4 years4.1 years
IRR over 15 years1%22%

Figures for a typical site. A busier one does better and a quiet one worse, within the range above.

Cumulative cash flow, 15 years

The year a column crosses the zero line is the year that station has paid for itself.

Yr 0 · Ordinary station: -1.3 bn ₫ · Volterra: -2.6 bn ₫0Yr 1 · Ordinary station: -1.2 bn ₫ · Volterra: -2.0 bn ₫1Yr 2 · Ordinary station: -1.1 bn ₫ · Volterra: -1.4 bn ₫2Yr 3 · Ordinary station: -1.0 bn ₫ · Volterra: -732 m ₫3Yr 4 · Ordinary station: -919 m ₫ · Volterra: -98 m ₫4Yr 5 · Ordinary station: -831 m ₫ · Volterra: 536 m ₫5Yr 6 · Ordinary station: -742 m ₫ · Volterra: 1.2 bn ₫6Yr 7 · Ordinary station: -653 m ₫ · Volterra: 1.8 bn ₫7Yr 8 · Ordinary station: -565 m ₫ · Volterra: 2.4 bn ₫8Yr 9 · Ordinary station: -476 m ₫ · Volterra: 3.1 bn ₫9Yr 10 · Ordinary station: -387 m ₫ · Volterra: 3.7 bn ₫10Yr 11 · Ordinary station: -299 m ₫ · Volterra: 3.4 bn ₫11Yr 12 · Ordinary station: -210 m ₫ · Volterra: 4.1 bn ₫12Yr 13 · Ordinary station: -121 m ₫ · Volterra: 4.7 bn ₫13Yr 14 · Ordinary station: -33 m ₫ · Volterra: 5.3 bn ₫14Yr 15 · Ordinary station: 56 m ₫ · Volterra: 6.0 bn ₫156.0 bn ₫-2.6 bn ₫
Ordinary station Volterra

What this estimate assumes

A standard configuration with no site rent deducted. The tool does not know the three things that matter most: how many cars pass your site, what the grid connection will cost you, and who is already selling electricity nearby.

Step 2: why the site has to be scored

Good numbers on paper still lose money at the wrong address.

Everything above assumes cars actually show up. That happens when there are enough drivers around the site, when a substation is close enough to connect at a sensible cost, and when nobody is already selling electricity next door. Miss one of those and the table above turns around.

Below: how we measure that risk

The site alone shifts payback by

1.7 years

Same build, same budget, same region. The only thing that changed is how busy the station is.

Next step · free

The range is wide because we do not know your site yet.

Send the address and we run it again using the zoning on that parcel, land prices around it, and every charger within 3 km. What comes back is one number instead of a range.

Score my site

Under a minute to fill in · PDF report within 3 working days

The report also has

  • A site score out of 100with the heat map and competitor list around you
  • Real CAPEX for your budgethow many AC and DC bays, and which transformer rating
  • Risks that break a budgetgrid connection cost, zoning conflicts, competition

Why the site decides

Three ways a good-looking site loses money

01

The cost of getting power there

A site can tick every other box and still fail because the nearest substation is a kilometre away. Medium-voltage cable over that distance can cost more than the chargers themselves.

02

Zoning, and the competitor opening next year

A busy corner today can be split three ways once two more stations open nearby. Or the parcel turns out to be zoned for something a charging station is not allowed to be.

03

Fast chargers where nobody is in a hurry

A DC charger costs nine times what an AC one does. Put DC in a car park where cars sit overnight and it stands idle most of the day. This is the most common way to spend a budget badly.

What gets analysed

Three layers before the score comes out

Every figure in the report says where it came from, so you can check it.

1Layer 1

Space and demand

Where the cars are

  • We lay a grid of cells over the area and score each one, so you can see where you stand inside your own neighbourhood.
  • Road access, frontage, and whether a car can turn in off the street without a fight.
  • Every charging point within 3 km: who runs it, how much power, how many bays.
2Layer 2

Zoning and land

The condition that has to pass first

  • Zoning read at your exact parcel, on every published planning layer.
  • Asking prices for land around it, which is what the rent in the model is based on.
  • An engineer reads this layer by hand. A zoning decision is a legal document, and matching keywords against the land-use name gets it wrong.
3Layer 3

Financial simulation

The number you decide on

  • How many chargers your budget buys, of which type, and what transformer rating they need.
  • Fifteen years of cash flow, including tax, depreciation and the battery replacement in year 11.
  • Three scenarios: a busy site, a typical one and a quiet one.

How scoring works

From an address to a decision, in four steps

1

You mark the spot

Pick the site on a map and tell us the budget. Under a minute, and no technical figures.

2

The engine scores it

Five weighted criteria (access, demand, anchors, distance to power, competition), normalised against a nationwide scale.

3

An engineer reads the plan

Zoning at your parcel and land prices nearby are looked up by hand.

4

You get the report

Score, heat map, competitor list, recommended build and a 15-year cash flow in three scenarios. It is yours to keep.

What you get

What arrives in your PDF report

A document with enough detail to take into a meeting with an investor or a bank.

A site score out of 100

With a rating of prime, strong, marginal or weak, and which criterion pulled the score down.

Heat map and competitors

Your rank among the cells around you, with the list of competing stations within 3 km.

Recommended build

How many AC bays, how many DC, which transformer rating, and what it all costs.

15-year cash flow

Revenue, grid cost, land rent and payback, in three scenarios, year by year.

The blocking conditions

Zoning, minimum budget and financial viability, each marked pass, fail or unverified. If a condition fails, the report says the site is not ready even when the score is high.

Sample

Site assessment report

78

example figures

Strong

Worth building

Access95
Demand density82
Anchors77
Distance to power43
Competition96
Open the full sample report

Find out what your site scores

Free, with nothing attached. If the site does not work, the report says so.

Score my site

Open the detailed modelEvery assumption and the year-by-year figures, for readers who want the spreadsheet.

This tool gives a preliminary estimate for a standard configuration. The figures in your report are computed for your actual site. Neither one is a permit, a grid connection agreement or planning clearance. A final investment decision still needs a site survey and written capacity confirmation from the utility.